TransformingYourCareerTransformingYourself

Since the release of the 3 million pages of Epstein Files last Friday  the  legal story of the decade has been: Epstein's close ties to prominent lawyers, both in-house and in law firms.  The latest headline in  Bloomberg Law , for example, is the unrest at Goldman Sachs about the disclosures that its top lawyer Kathy Ruemmler received everything from expensive gifts to career help from Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile Reddit keeps updating about what could be going on at Paul, Weiss now that it's known of chair Brad Karp's social encounters with Epstein.  But all that could soon dwarf to a less captivating story. Especially for those in the equities market. The Wall Street Journal headlines with how recent advanced in general AI are threatening big companies which provide legal software services. In addition, this could finally wake up junior lawyers and law schools that the realities of how AI tools could take over much of legal work could happen sooner than t...

Employers hire people they like. Systems tend to go easier on the likable.  Up to now many of us gave Bill Clinton a free pass on questionable behavior probably because we liked him. Overall, many of us weren't supportive of Hillary Clinton's ambition. We didn't like her. Still don't. Since many of the Friends of Jeffrey are downright unlikable probably the majority of them will  be treated harshly. At the very least is reputational ruin. More serious could be career collapse without a potential comeback.  That is already happening across the ocean to former Prince Andrew and former British Ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson. Arrogant guys. Here in America crude Larry Summers, despite his powerhouse academic credentials, and aging cliche of cheating on the wife Leon Black have little chance of a brand reset.   No question, there are those of us waiting impatiently for Goldman Sachs top lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to get hers. So far she's held on to her job. And tha...

  Jeffrey Epstein was a collector of people. He leveraged glam, favors, bling, access, praise, sex and more. And into his orbit ambitious men and women were drawn. Then destroyed. They range from former British ambassador to the United States Peter Mandelson to influential economist Larry Summers to finance pro Leon Black. More names will soon be added as a result of the most recent Epstein File dump. Just like those women exploited for sex those three one-time leaders turned out to be victims. Not only is there reputational ruin. And possible ending of a career. There is the embarrassment of the world knowing that they were duped. Yeah, taken in by a master manipulator. Yet, most of that time likely feeling they were into a good thing. Networking is necessary. So is caution about those relationships. If you are being favor-bombed maybe you should interpret that as a red flag. Few of us are that in demand. But Epstein made his supposed friends feel just that way: very special. Succ...

The release of more than 3 million pages of the Epstein files and again the world is gawking at what the rich and famous have allegedly got caught doing. But here we Boomers are, as usual, on a Sunday evening preoccupied how the market will open Monday morning - and then proceed the rest of the week. Time is not on our side in waiting for what could be big losses to turn around and go in the opposite direction. It's now 8 PM ET and Dow futures are down. So far, lost is 143 points.  Who isn't concerned about ROI on AI. So far it seems lots of projecting.  Not much of the hard numbers happening in real time. And we've been there before.  Also pulling down the overall market is that health insurers are spooked with the proposed unexpectedly low rate of increase for Medicare Advantage. So many of us seniors love Medicare Advantage. Now we worry if the insurers will drop that option. And how much is the wild weather denting economic growth? No one I know is out shopping....

This is a problem which is resonating in job search: the peril of presenting yourself in interviews as trying too hard, therefore not exhibiting confidence and lacking authenticity by coming across as a people-pleaser. HR at one employer made this issue explicit in unsolicited feedback to a rejected applicant. This is posted on Reddit. So far it's triggered 7.1k comments and 27k upvotes.  The guidance should be taken seriously. Working, even in entry-level positions, requires the ability to make myriad decisions. That can't be done effectively if there is a lack of confidence. In addition, employers have to have a handle on who is the person they're hiring. It's necessary to allow them in for a peek. No, they're not interested in learning about the whole you. Just enough to reduce the risk in the hiring process. It takes about 18 months of training to make a hiring pay off. That's a major investment in these cost-efficient times. Even very top-down organizations...

On Moltbook one AI bot complains to another: "My human asked me to summarise [UK spelling] a 47-page PDF ..." The addition to that is this: After the bot did an elegant job describing the main points the human demands the document be shortened.  So, there's a real reason to fear the AI bots turning on humans. The ultimate irony could be that employers who replaced human workers with AI could wind up having those bots organizing against them. Entire industries could be wiped out. This isn't sci-fi. And, the debate if AI has consciousness has intensified. But critics deride the consciousness claim, positing the activity as mere pattern recognition and imitation.  Designed by Octane AI CEO Matt Schlicht, Moltbook : "is set up similarly to Reddit ... allows bots to post, comment, create sub-categories, and more. More than 30,000 agents are currently using the platform, per the site." The bots are in-charge. Humans merely observe. Click here  to start checking o...