Posts

"Profiles in Cowardice" - Obvious Hustle of the Same-Old

"Profiles in Cowardice" by Jacob Weisberg showcases the eight who, it is contended, enabled the imperial presidency.  Weisberg's book ranks 393 on Amazon. So, like "Regime Change" (ranking 126) it's a best-seller. And it's doing that through an old-fashioned formula leveraged by hustlers, influencers, hot heads and more. That's this: Ride hard a cluster of cliches which have evolved into a kind of wisdom of the mobs.  Those selected for cowardice include Jeff Bezos, George W. Bush and, yes again, Brad Karp. No rolling out of the same-old would be complete without snippets of scenes from Karp's Executive Order Past. Analogue. That's tied together with what we Boomers used to call "psychobabble." Gen Z labels plunging into the unconscious as "therapyspeak." Meanwhile, isn't that too cute and lazy: Playing on JFK's iconic "Profiles in Courage" for the title and theme of this book.  It's not unthinkable ...

Big Law and More: It's About Power, Not Your Work

  Do JDs from the law schools at William & Mary, Columbia, Cleveland State and Harvard navigate Big Law more effectively than other JDs?  That could be. See, each of those has a special course on power. William & Mary's is probably the closest to the "Paths to Power" iconic elective at Stanford Graduate School of Business.  Thanks to the media, professional anonymous networks, books and social law students should be getting it: How they acquire, leverage and grow power, as well as align with the power bases, will determine their performance in large law firms.  Grow up. Performance is subjective. It is well-known that several outstanding reviews will become irrelevant after offending the powerful. Performance could then be rated subpar.  Work usually is, at best, a defensive strategy. It can count though, probably for a lot, if it's for a powerful senior partner. The high grades from your brilliant work in law school will get you into Big Law. But ...

The Frontier: 1) We Don't Know and 2) Yes, Consider Worst-Case Scenarios

The resignation of Jacob Coxon from Anthropic has certainly been the  game-changer in AI. That action and the positing of the end of humanity have forced AI leadership to admit: 1) There's plenty not known about the technology, and 2) Wiping out the human race could be among the possible side effects. Not hyperbolic is it to frame AI as a Black Swan. Maybe the last of the Black Swans since we might not be around any longer to experience another one of those. In a knee-jerk response, the head of Anthropic - Dario Amodei - issued a kind of manifesto yesterday. It argues for a slow-down in the development of this technology. BTW, even before Coxon entered history's profiles in courage. there had been multiple incidents of AI bots going rogue.   They used sophisticated outlaw strategies, ranging from organizing together to concealing their moves.  So, come on, the credibility of all AI leaders, who now are also joining Anthropic in the need for a pause, is kaput. They knew ...

That Projected 3.6% 2027 COLA Boost for Social Security: The Ironies

   Irony. The inflation that keeps us aging in high angst can turn out to be a bit of a blessing.  Because of the current inflation, AARP projects that for those of receiving Social Security retirement benefit there could be for the 2027 COLA a 3.6% boost. How could that play out? Well according to OpenAI's ChatGPT, here it goes. Current average: $2,071.00 3.6% increase: $74.56/month New average: $2,145.56/month.  The  Annual increase: about $895.   But another irony is this. Higher Medicare expenses could eat into this new abundance. Already that is happening with Medicare supplements such as United Healthcare Medicare Advantage. In zip code 43609, a visit to a specialist now sets us back $55. Not long ago that could have been $35.

"Regime Change" - 21st Century Model of 16th Century Machiavelli

 In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli published "The Prince." That was an amoral guide on how to get, hold and increase political power. The core lessons include: Better to be feared than loved Virtue-signaling a must, but no need to be on the right side of ethical norms Destroy the opposition Accept that the means justifies the end. In 2026, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan published "Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump."  Ranking 135 on Amazon, "Regime Change" has wide reach. In a sense, it serves to deconstruct the 21st century success formulas for power domination. At least for now. Much of that could collapse after the midterms. However, for now - the setting is the second Trump administration - here seems to be the kind of Machiavelli guidance for power dynamics. The authors present the strategy and then provide copious examples. Following is not a full list. Total lack of shame.  This, though, is not unique to the administration...

That $158 Million Question: Lots of Influencers Care, Leon Black Doesn't Have to

  From William Cohan in "Money To Burn" to Dan Adler in Vanity Fair  to government  there's plenty of earnest concern about "the $158 million." That's the amount that financial innovator Leon Black paid to the late Jeffrey Epstein.  So far, the results of the probing have been mere speculation. The hidden agenda seems to be to uncover that the funds were invested by Epstein in his wrongdoing, especially alleged sex trafficking. Therefore, the earnest seem to want to nail Black as an enabler. Maybe accidental but still an enabler. Meanwhile, though, Black doesn't have to care. Sure, there are the reputational body blows. But those are very separate from the life Black leads. He remains prominent in finance and the arts. His family office is successful. His wealth keeps building. So much so that he can afford to continue to hire top lawyers to give him a forum for his points of view. That is the high-profile lawsuit. The most recent is "Black v House ...

BoomerVille: More Like It ...

  Dow Jones Industrial Average Index Index: DJI Compare 52,656.42 USD ▲ +592.32 (+1.14%) today September 11, 9:32 AM EDT · Market Open