Matthew Wollin's Attack on Big Law Has Unintended Consequence: Finally, New Understanding of the Pickle Paul, Weiss' Brad Karp Was in
In Today's Opinion section of The New York Times Matthew Wollin has lots negative to say about the power and politics of large law firms. The usual word count for such op-eds ranges 1,200 to 1,800. His stretches to 2,230. Obviously his five years as a lawyer at WilmerHale didn't train him to be concise. It might, though, have entitled him to more than the typical space to present a point of view. Wollin is now a writer and filmmaker. But, and this is cute, he leverages the prestige of his former line of work to attack the prestige and more of Big Law. However, more to the point. Those I speak with about this oped wonder: How skilled was he as a lawyer if in this lengthy piece his arguments come across as absolutist, simplistic, reductive and even contradictory. For instance. he confuses the role of representing clients - even the very wealthy - with a capitulation to their particular values. Being entitled to the best defense - and Big Law is known for delivering...