Those Performance Reviews - The Myth of Constructive Criticism

 Let's cut to the chase. If a mentor or even a supervisor wants to provide well-intentioned recommendations on how you can improve your professional performance, they should be doing that in a private totally off-the-record informal conversation. Not via a formal totally on-the-record performance review. 

The official performance review has always served as a kind of documentation for termination. In the GE empire that Jack Welch has created the system was known as rank-and-yank. If what was checked off on your performance review and the textual comments put you at the bottom of your group, you were out. The formal review process released the corporation from any legal liability in the firing. And since it was a firing it skipped that paying unemployment insurance cost.

Currently, in this choppy economy in which cost-reduction can mean survival more and more businesses are using the performance review to quickly downsize the manpower expense. An added advantage of this kind of termination is that it does not transmit a signal of business financial distress the way an official layoff does.

With good reason a junior lawyer is concerned because the performance review was "lukewarm." Here is the thread on Reddit Big Law. During the pandemic boom many law firms over hired. To retain the talent they boosted annual salaries to nosebleed levels. Now with a slowdown in demand they are saddled with expensive overcapacity. As one response indicates to that Reddit post, it has become commonplace for those law firms to position and package the review in such a way as to be the initial step in swinging the ax for performance reasons.

Given these dynamics it is downright naive to trust the contention that superiors want to "help" you by officially evaluating your performance negatively. That is, they claim they intend to motivate you to better performance. If that were really the situation, with no document trail they would be mentoring you. That guidance would be very specific. Not the vague statements on a performance review.

Takeaway: Beware performance-review time. That could put you on short time at the business.

In transition in your career? Need more income? Healing from a professional setback? Intuitive career coaching.

“On the menu” of services are Tarot readings, both spreads and one-card pulls. Complimentary consultation.

Please contact janegenova374@gmail.com or text 203-468-8579

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Akin Gump Julia Ghahramani's March 2021 Cocaine+ Death - So?

   It had been way back more than a year ago that first-year associate at law firm Akin Gump Julia Ghahramani died from cocaine laced with fentanyl. Yet that story keeps resurfacing.  This week  RollonFriday  revisits it. And  Reddit Big Law  considers the issue if the energy from cocaine is what's making possible those 2,500 hours billed in law firms.  Is what's keeping this on the radar the hunch that use of the illegal substance cocaine is common among those practicing law? After all, in addition to being an energy-booster, it provides a nice reward for such hard-working lawyers. Also, they have the earnings to afford it. Most of the rest of gunners have to stick with boozing. So, why not?  The reality might be setting in that the death could simply have been an aberration. Think about it this way: Ghahramani had bad luck in her alleged choice of dealers. Others might be able to exert more scrutiny in overseeing the content of the illegal drugs they sold. The message c
Read more

Up-or-Out: McKinsey Raises the Pressure, In Contrast Some Law Firms Ease It through Nonequity Partner Tier

" McKinsey & Co.  warned some US consultants last week they are running out of time to win promotion, raising the 'up or out' pressure on staff as the global consulting industry struggles." - Abovethefold Article in Bloomberg , March 27, 2024 This is yet another sign that once-iconic McKinsey is a professional services firm in trouble. One challenge is overcapacity of manpower. It has also warned about 3,000 consultants about "concerns" regarding their performance.  In addition to the overall slowdown in management consulting, McKinsey faces scrutiny from myriad sources about its client list including assignments with China and Saudi Arabia. There also has been that hatchet-job book "When McKinsey Comes to Town." The most damning aspect of the expose is that former employees dump on it. Posts on the professional anonymous network Fishbowl Consulting aren't optimistic about a turnaround at McKinsey or at other players in that sector. In cont
Read more

Down Memory Lane - There Was Actually a Time in When $70k for New JDs Was Big Money

  Let's cut to the chase. The year was 1987.  On a Monday in October the stock market crashed.  Corporate downsizing, made an art at GE by Jack Welch, was purging the system of middle-aged middle managers. Staples caught the wave of accidental entrepreneurs forced out of corporate careers. It created the new category of office supplies for small business. We the purged agonized at Staples about what color business stationary.  It was the worst of economic times, at least since The Great Depression.  Meanwhile, large law firms were getting a lot of attention because they were paying inexperienced law-school graduates starting salaries of up to $70k.  Cravath got the ball rolling on that. The phenomenon was enough to attract a major article by The Washington Post.   The kicker was this: The money wasn't enough for young lawyers to stay with those jobs which they found long in the hours and short on stimulating assignments. Often they were locked into proofreading documents at the
Read more