The MBA - Sending Lots of the Wrong Signals

 What a difference half a century makes. 

In the late 1970s the MBA was the ticket. For getting in, for being promoted, for the knowledge assumed to be required to start a business. In order to transition from non-profit to the private sector I took calculus, the GMAT and coaching for my application to be admitted to the MBA program. I was right: One semester in, I landed a plum job in Big Oil at more than double my salary and with an expense account. 

Now, as The Wall Street Journal has been telling us for a few years and again today: The marketability of that degree has declined. That's because employers not only value hands-on skills more than education. The MBA sends the wrong signals. Those include:

Expectations of higher wages

Entitlement for special treatment

Stuck in school-learning that has to be unlearned.

Too clever by far. There is the stigma of being branded negatively as the smartest kid in the room and, as with Jeff Stilling who was a Harvard MBA, winding up in prison. 

The update on the crash of this professional degree is that some educational institutions such as Purdue and Johns Hopkins are providing steep discounts on tuition. 

Meanwhile, though, even those prestigious settings like Harvard Business School are producing graduates who can't get jobs. The latest figure is 23%. Sectors which absorb them such as consulting are contracting. 

In contrast, applications to law school continue to surge. The ambitious are blowing off warnings from the US Supreme Court chief Justice John Roberts, partner at Paul, Weiss Brad Karp and co-founder of Quinn Emanuel John Quinn that AI will significantly reduce demand for junior lawyers.

Paul, Weiss and McDermott recently cut the number of associates. 

Just this week law firm MinterEllison slashed junior lawyer hiring by nearly a third. It was blunt about why: AI bots will be replacing inexperienced lawyers. 

The Predictions market could be taking bets on how many summer interns this year will be receiving offers to return as a full-time associate and if the JD Class of 2027 will the first to experience a perfect storm of cost-efficiency mandates, AI and offshoring. 

In coaching I guide the despondent as well as the overconfident to seek out their own intel about ROI on not only professional degrees but also all kinds of training. Scams are exploding. Then I push them to connect the dots in a totally pragmatic way. Ditch passion and purpose. Assess risk.  

Earning a Good Living in 2026 Involves Mental Combat. The enemy is usually your own thinking.

Complimentary consultation. No Pressure. Solid Guidance. Contact Jane Genova janegenova374@gmail.com.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America Not Hiring in 2026: Back to Golden Age of Solopreneurs?

Newly Minted PhDs in Economics Face Unwelcoming Job Market: Of Course, I Left My PhD in Humanities Off the Resume

Sex-Economy a Global Growth Business - The Economist, Skadden Former Partner David Eisman and More Agree