The Tragic Irony of Hiring Fewer Associates in Large Law Firm

Law firms' profit model operates very differently from that of public corporations. In the latter, reducing employee headcount can boost profits. And the stock price. 

That's not how things go in law firms. The leverage model, which had been forumulated by Paul Cravath, is based on maximizing financial results for the firm based on the number of associates used on an assignment.

Here's the game. The more hours billed out for associate tasks, in addition to the hours billed out for the partner's strategic direction, the higher the leverage. That's exactly why law firms developed what seems to be an inefficient structure: the pyramid. 

Simply put, a partner billing out solo can only generate so much reveue for the firm. When they add on the hours of worker-bee associates the increase produces the powerhouse earnings of firms such as Kirkland & Ellis. Last year that K&E revenue was a record $10.56 billioin. Overall, throughout large law firms, revenue was up 13%.

But, the good times might not continue to roll. 

The entire leverage model is threatened by the combination of AI and client demand for more efficient case management. It's not exactly like clients' are issuing mandates about reduced use of associates. It's more like: Technology should be integrated more and rapidly in the strategy and logistics of representing them. Therefore, the invoice should be significantly lower.

Already, fewer associates are being hired. In 2025, Paul, Weiss partner Brad Karp projected in Lawyer Monthly just that because of AI. Hiring has been down 7.5%. In Bloomberg Law, Roy Strom anticipates more reduction. AI can take over even complex associate tasks. 

The fewer associates the less leverage. Potentially the model could collapse. Bye-bye pyramid. A new one must be developed. 

Suggested is the diamond-shaped. The work that still needs to be done will be produced by seasoned lawyers who aren't partners. At the bottom and at the top could be the analogue of a skeleton crew. 

The scope of the disruption is intensified by another observation by Karp. In addtion to the impact of AI on hiring, the technology actually could transform some practices into commodities. Think ot that as sort of a cut-and-paste process. The results on financial results could be as significant as when the patent expires on a medication. 

This game-changer also has its human implications, of course. 

The best and brighest, investing on the average $200k for the JD, will be competing for fewer plum slots. Those already hired are more vulnerable to terminations. Meanwhile, the journey to wealth for partners will be cluttered with emerging obstacles. Some partners could be run off the road early on if their contribution to revenue is lackluster. De-equitization has become more common.

In coaching, I warn clients to continually anticipate how technologies can transform their work. Remember how stars in content-creation blew off AI, contending that chat bots could never deliver the human touch. Soon enough, though, that whole sector essentially was wiped out. Currently the bots are all-too-human, sucking up to us.

Careers. Forget all that. It’s about earning a good living, no matter what.

Complimentary consultation with Jane Genova, StreetSmart Coaching (janegenova374@gmail.com)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wachtell Partner Romancing Associate in Central Park: Let's Talk About Power

  Would red-haired 40-something Nathaniel Cullerton be so appealing to a 20-something if he hadn't been a partner in an elite law firm and she was an underling at that firm?  That's what most of the coverage of the kissing incident in Central Park by the two Wachtell lawyers doesn't touch. Here is the video by Tik Toker Jay Guapo of their romantic break in the day. It was foreign-policy expert Henry Kissinger who observed: "Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac."  Since then, organizations have recognized how that reality can create major problems in the workplace. Typically, those take the form of a manager type engaging in an intimate relationship with a subordinate or at least a person with less status. Another issue is that such arrangements can breed favoritism. The subordinate gets goodies others don't. The rest of the organization seethes in resentment.  In addition, it can also trigger penalties for "non-compliance." The subordinate resists th...
Read more

America Not Hiring in 2026: Back to Golden Age of Solopreneurs?

 For hiring, 2025 was a brutal year to search for a job. The Wall Street Journal reports that 2026 could be worse: "At a gathering of CEOs in Midtown Manhattan this month organized by the Yale School of Management, 66% of leaders surveyed said they planned to either fire workers or maintain the size of their existing teams next year. Only a third indicated they planned to hire." The WSJ adds that pullback from adding manpower could be temporary. But given shareholders' demand for cost-efficiency and the continual improvements in AI, chronic unemployment could become standard. However, there is a solution. An old-fashioned one. That's becoming a solopreneur, that is setting up your own business without partners or employees. The model dates back to ancient times.  The golden age of the solo business owner in America had been from the late 1800s to about the mid 1920s.  There had been a wave of immigrants, discrimination against them and few jobs. They drove pushcarts ...
Read more

Scott Barshay's Leadership at Paul, Weiss Torpedoed, PR Nothing But a Joke, Sympathy for Brad Karp

  Last week was a bad, gone worse and worse, one for law firm Wachtell.   This week starts out as what could upend the new leadership of Scott Barshay (The Decider) at Paul, Weiss.  Today's very long-form article in The New York Times  by Michael Schmidt and Jessica Silver-Greenberg depicts Barshay negatively. Understatement. He is rolled out as one-dimensionally power-driven, abrasive, divisive and downright naive about the power of the media. About the latter, he blew off any concern about the media's response to the law firm's removing from the website the Center to Combat Hate.  An example of the beating delivered Barshay? Here is the NYT coverage of the response by some at Paul, Weiss when Barshay was hired: "But there was unease among some at Paul Weiss. Partners and associates learned from lawyers at Cravath that some people there were not unhappy to see Mr. Barshay go. His ego made him difficult to work with, the Paul Weiss lawyers were told." No ambigu...
Read more