September 2026 Jobs Report & Legal Sector: Good TImes Keep Rolling (for now)

 The jobs report for September 2026 was a Debbie Downer, for some: Only 29,000 jobs created. 

But for others, such as us Boomers ultra concerned about what the stock market is doing, it brought relief. Given those disappointing job numbers, the feds probably won't raise interest rates again, at least not in the near future. The Dow closed up 250.40. Tonight, after days of not checking my financial statement, I might take a peek.

Meanwhile, though, in one sector the good times keep rolling. That's legal services. Last month 2,000 jobs were created. Reuters provides more details:

"The Bureau of Labor Statistics ​counted 1,249,000 legal sector jobs in September, including lawyers, paralegals, judges and ​legal assistants, up 2,000 jobs ​from August and 7.6% higher than ‌five ⁠years earlier"

And, as Law Fuel documents, if you make it big in a law firm, that could really be big in compensation. Given Star Wars - that is, poaching rainmakers - a partner can be pulling down $20 million each year in guaranteed compensation for several years. 

However, AI might bring a lot of that crashing down. That's because AI, with its elimination of lots of simple and even complex processes, can blow up the leverage model. That model is what generates the over-the-top Profits Per Equity Paetner.

Here's the game. The more hours billed out for associate tasks, in addition to the hours billed out for the partner's strategic direction, the higher the leverage. That's exactly why law firms developed what seems to be an inefficient structure: the pyramid. Yes, hire a bunch of entry-level lawyers. 

Do the math. A partner billing out solo can only generate so much reveue for the firm. When they add on the hours of associates the increase produces the powerhouse earnings of firms such as Kirkland & Ellis. Last year that K&E revenue was a record $10.56 billioin. Overall, throughout large law firms, revenue was up 13%.

The entire leverage model is threatened, though, by the perfect storm of AI and client demand for more efficient case management. It's not exactly like clients' are issuing mandates about reduced use of associates. It's this: Technology should be integrated more and rapidly in the strategy and logistics of the firm's representing them. Therefore, the invoice should be significantly lower.

Already, despite the awesome recent job creation numbers, hiring of associates is down 7.5%. More reductions are projected by those watching these things. In addition, more partners are being forced out from that role. De-equitization is common. 

Therefore, the timing might not be right to be starting out in law firms, at least not as a lawyer. Some large law firms, such as Cooley, are bilking up with engineers and hiring fewer associates. Partner at Paul, Weiss Brad Karp indicated there would be ramped-up hiring of data scientists and technologists. 

In addition, the timing might also be right to plan on exiting for another line of work. The pyramid model could be replaced with the diamond one. Few at the bottom and top and a bulge of worker bees in the middle. If private equity makes inroads, partners could have less authority and influence. 

In coaching I ask clients to reflect on the Zen mantra: Clear Thinking, Don't Know.

Careers. Forget all that. It’s about earning a good living, no matter what.

Complimentary consultation with Jane Genova, StreetSmart Coaching (janegenova374@gmail.com)




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

America Not Hiring in 2026: Back to Golden Age of Solopreneurs?

 For hiring, 2025 was a brutal year to search for a job. The Wall Street Journal reports that 2026 could be worse: "At a gathering of CEOs in Midtown Manhattan this month organized by the Yale School of Management, 66% of leaders surveyed said they planned to either fire workers or maintain the size of their existing teams next year. Only a third indicated they planned to hire." The WSJ adds that pullback from adding manpower could be temporary. But given shareholders' demand for cost-efficiency and the continual improvements in AI, chronic unemployment could become standard. However, there is a solution. An old-fashioned one. That's becoming a solopreneur, that is setting up your own business without partners or employees. The model dates back to ancient times.  The golden age of the solo business owner in America had been from the late 1800s to about the mid 1920s.  There had been a wave of immigrants, discrimination against them and few jobs. They drove pushcarts ...
Read more

Scott Barshay's Leadership at Paul, Weiss Torpedoed, PR Nothing But a Joke, Sympathy for Brad Karp

  Last week was a bad, gone worse and worse, one for law firm Wachtell.   This week starts out as what could upend the new leadership of Scott Barshay (The Decider) at Paul, Weiss.  Today's very long-form article in The New York Times  by Michael Schmidt and Jessica Silver-Greenberg depicts Barshay negatively. Understatement. He is rolled out as one-dimensionally power-driven, abrasive, divisive and downright naive about the power of the media. About the latter, he blew off any concern about the media's response to the law firm's removing from the website the Center to Combat Hate.  An example of the beating delivered Barshay? Here is the NYT coverage of the response by some at Paul, Weiss when Barshay was hired: "But there was unease among some at Paul Weiss. Partners and associates learned from lawyers at Cravath that some people there were not unhappy to see Mr. Barshay go. His ego made him difficult to work with, the Paul Weiss lawyers were told." No ambigu...
Read more

Newly Minted PhDs in Economics Face Unwelcoming Job Market: Of Course, I Left My PhD in Humanities Off the Resume

Monitor postings on Reddit subunits focused on careers and it's no longer news that PhDs, both newly minted and those already in the labor market, generally are finding the credential an obstacle in the search for a job or even contract assignments. No, not an asset.  Let's cut to the chase. The highly educated have to get smart about this, fast. With some exceptions, I advise those I coach to leave the PhD off job-search materials. The negative assumptions among those hiring range from that you expect too much money to you'll be a know-it-all.  When my boutique collapsed post-9/11 and I had to land a survival job I lopped off everything but the BA. At the interview I dumbed-down my vocabulary. Sure Harvard was started in 1636 but America remains anti-intellectual. In addition, the integration of AI into strategy and operations makes knowledge work in general less and less marketable.  That's the narrative of our times: Advanced degrees having low or no ROI. The result,...
Read more