Federal Judge Bans Generative AI Briefs Not Revewed By a Human
Critics of generative AI have called it many things. But this seems a first. U.S. District Judge in Tennessee Brantley Starr, reports Reuters Legal, described the generative AI platforms as having "hallucinations." The delusional state manifests itself in making things up. Those things have become infamous in the pickle Steven Schwartz finds himself in. The brief he submitted in a personal injury case contained three fake citations. ChatGPT came up with those. Now Schwartz faces possible sanctions. Since, as we might put it, generative AI platforms suffer from a mental defect, Judge Starr bans briefs researched through them unless the content is verified by humans through other legal databases. If lawyers don't comply in his court, they could be sanctioned. This could be the first kind of ruling about that particular issue on the federal level. Initially Starr was going to prohibit all AI chatbot generated content. However, it turns out he does asses...